Soros' Shadow Government

I have been saying it for the last few days. Here is another word of warning. Obama is NOT the enemy. Nor was Bush. They BOTH were puppets of George Soros.

George Soros as the puppeteer

Here is a link to a topic on the "Clowar Pivan Strategy"

Here is a link to a Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals"

The Price of gold reaches record highs

Why is gold going so high? Because the dollar is collapsing

The warning is this:
If we dont wake up and do something, we are headed for disaster.

The Clowar Piven Strategy (CPS) is to put as many people on the govmt dole in order to collapse Capitalism and replace it with Socialism.

From the CPS article:
"This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements -- mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown -- providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change. That was the theory."

It almost bankrupted New York in 1975
It almost bankrupted CA in 2009

In Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" he begins with:
"What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away. "

If you look at those rules, they are the same rules that most of my opponents to this thread will use.
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

and
Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

and
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

As we have heard from thier own mouths, many of those who surround Mr. Obama are Marxists/Socialists. Now, while I dont have any evidence that they subscribe to the tenets of Salinksy or Clowar Piven, they sure, by thier rhetoric, seem to have read the manuals.

Stand up. Wake the dragon. Have a voice. Be Heard. Do not go quietly into the night.

What say you?

The parable of the three bicycles

This is the parable of the three bicycles as found somehere in Matthew, maybe Mark.


Three families go to Wallymart (the names have been changed to protect the innocent) and each buys a different make and model of bike.

Included on the packaging are the dreaded words that Fathers hate to hear most, "Some Assembly Required". No problem these Dads have built many bikes before.

The first family opens the box and pulls out the instructions, open them up and they are in some written word. What language is this anyways? Did engineers make these instructions? The dad reads them, follows them, and finishes the bike. Well, it resembles a bike, but the bike is not assembled totally to specs.

The second family opens the box and the instructions are all pictures. Woo Hoo, right? Wrong, a picture is worth a thousand words, but it needs to be the right picture. This bike, too, when finished, resembles a bike, but still is not assembled to specs.

The third dad opens the box and throws away the instructions, after all, he has built tons of bikes, he doesnt need a stupid manual to tell him how to do it. When this Dad gets finished, the bike is no where near resembling a bike, pieces are lost, parts are broken and the Dad wonders where he went wrong.

The moral of the story is that even though some manuals are not the greatest, we can get close to the intended product by following them. When we think we can do something all by ourselves without consulting the manual, all we get is junk.

From where does free money come?

Sources:

Free-coat hoax touches off a riot

Thousands line up for free Obama Dollars...And nearly Riot..because they ran out of money

Obama Is Going To Pay For My Gas And Mortgage

People dont know where the money is coming from


Proposition:

1. People go ape in order to get free stuff.

2. When promised goods and services are not delivered, people go ape, even more, on the people responsible.

3. When you give away stuff for free, people line up to receive it

4. When you give stuff away for free, and there is a limited supply, you run out

5. People think the money is coming from Obamas personal stash

6. People thing Obama is promising free money of which there is a limited supply

7. The free money will run out therefore people who were promosed free money will go ape

8. People think the money is coming directly from Obama therefore they will go ape on Obama

9. Conclusion: Obama offering free money to the masses will result in chaos, riots, and civil disobedience directed toward the US Government in a very large way.

The Cloward-Piven Strategy

"The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty" AKA "The Cloward-Piven Strategy (CPS)


This article was first published in "The Nation" on May 2, 1966. It suggests a strategy for ending poverty. This strategy is all about redistribution of wealth. The tactics they suggest include creating crises in which the goverment welfare system is overwhelmed by too many people requesting benefits.

The end result is buying, nay enslaving the poor urban masses, by ensuring thier loyalties to thier "benefactors"

I have always said that liberals breed liberals. They use thier liberal viewpoints to enslave, not liberate.

No strategy, however confident its advocates may be, is foolproof. But if unforeseen contingencies thwart this plan to bring about new federal legislation in the field of poverty, it should also be noted that there would be gains even in defeat. For one thing, the plight of many poor people would be somewhat eased in the course of an assault upon public welfare. Existing recipients would come to know their rights and how to defend them, thus acquiring dignity where none now exists; and millions of dollars in withheld welfare benefits would become available to potential recipients now-not several generations from now. Such an attack should also be welcome to those currently concerned with programs designed to equip the young to rise out of poverty (e.g., Head Start), for surely children learn more readily when the oppressive burden of financial insecurity is lifted from the shoulders of their parents. And those seeking new ways to engage the Negro politically should remember that public resources have always been the fuel for low-income urban political organization. If organizers can deliver millions of dollars in cash benefits to the ghetto masses, it seems reasonable to expect that the masses will deliver their loyalties to their benefactors. At least, they have always done so in the past.

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." - GB Shaw